It was a pretty lucrative stable too. Will be interesting to see what comes out of it. If we hear much of anything at all.Bella Forrest is the name behind a stable of ghostwriters.
From what I understand, there was/is some sort of issue with a ghostwriter and there's ongoing litigation that can't be made public. So no one really knows what's happened, and it's all just conjecture at this point.
Holy moly. That's a little mind bending.There was a big thread on this when it happened at one of the other author forums that included a link to one of the lawsuits around the whole thing. Basic idea is that there's some dispute around who owns the rights to the stories published under this name. Is it the young woman who supposedly started this whole thing up and managed a stable of ghost writers and brought in a money manager who she gave full control of her funds so he could hide them in offshore jurisdictions? Or is it the shadowy money manager who claims she's no more than just an employee and he's the one who directed it all?
I guess the days are gone when kboards people rally to Bella Forrest's defense to claim that she does not use ghost writers... that she is just one talented person who writes prolifically. LOL.
There's nothing to defend. Readers don't care if she's six toddlers stacked on top of each other under a trench coat. The only thing that'll hurt "Bella Forrest" is not releasing for however long this takes.I guess the days are gone when kboards people rally to Bella Forrest's defense to claim that she does not use ghost writers... that she is just one talented person who writes prolifically. LOL.
I still remember when I found out that Ann M. Martin didn't personally write all the five bazillion Babysitter's Club books. The never-ending MG/YA series with a team of ghostwriters has been a thing since Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys.I guess the days are gone when kboards people rally to Bella Forrest's defense to claim that she does not use ghost writers... that she is just one talented person who writes prolifically. LOL.
that was always so dishonest and insult to the intelligence of anyone who knows how long it takes to get things doneI guess the days are gone when kboards people rally to Bella Forrest's defense to claim that she does not use ghost writers... that she is just one talented person who writes prolifically. LOL.
To be fair, Amanda M. Lee was active here for many years and everyone knows her output is beyond prolific, so it's possible.that was always so dishonest and insult to the intelligence of anyone who knows how long it takes to get things done
Yes, it lead to a lot of my least favorite indie author tendency: the erasing of all publishing work besides writing. Even if an individual writer could write as fast as Bella Forrest publishes (and I think that's highly doubtful), they'd also have to do all the packaging and marketing and admin Bella Forrest does. And she does (did) a lot of marketing. That is a task that takes both time and energy. Time and energy that can no longer be spent on writing.that was always so dishonest and insult to the intelligence of anyone who knows how long it takes to get things done
as well as an insult to everyone who has ever worked as a ghostwriter & was supposed to sit by silently while their profession was trashed as somehow dishonorable
"everyone" knows?To be fair, Amanda M. Lee was active here for many years and everyone knows her output is beyond prolific, so it's possible.
i'm literally not ignoring your point, i'm engaging with it because i do not understand your pointEveryone who's been paying attention over the years noticed there's a member of our community that releases 2+ books a month. Productivity debates aren't new. But go on, split hairs and ignore my point.
You kicked things off by saying those defending Bella Forrest before were dishonest and insulting the intelligence of anyone who knows how long it takes to get things done. Where's your extraordinary evidence for that claim?i'm literally not ignoring your point, i'm engaging with it because i do not understand your point
extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence
claiming "everybody" knows something that almost no one would be in a position to verify for themselves... is the opposite of evidence