I thought titles weren't protected by copyright.
Copyright and trademark are two separate things. Is the party claiming a trademark issue with the title or a copyright issue with the text of the book?alexandervalmont said:Am I the only one?
They say there is a copyright issue with my book title and they blocked it. They gave me the website of the third party who filed the claim and they do NOT own this trademark at all.
Anybody here had to call them or send them an email to fix this?
Yeah, that was me: http://www.kboards.com/index.php/topic,210050.0.html I can't tell whether this is the same kind of thing or not.Richard Stooker said:Maybe somebody can post a link to that thread.
That's vile! What a dastardly scam to try and pull!Becca Mills said:Yeah, that was me: http://www.kboards.com/index.php/topic,210050.0.html I can't tell whether this is the same kind of thing or not.
I agree! I think we should have a "word of the day" challenge on KBoards. The challenge? Use the designated word in as many posts as possible. Dastardly could be today's word! (There! I used it!)carinasanfey said:I know this is completely off topic, but the word 'dastardly' just doesn't get used enough these days. I commend you, sir, for helping to keep that dastardly word alive.
Although it would be dastardly to derail this thread...carinasanfey said:What a dastardly idea, Betsy; this is only going to fuel my dastardly kboards addiction!
Ahem... Your first use of the word is used incorrectly, unless you actually feel that Betsy's idea is abominable. The second usage is spiffy.carinasanfey said:What a dastardly idea, Betsy; this is only going to fuel my dastardly kboards addiction!
The same thing happen to Cassandra Zara right after you with her best selling stepbrother series. She got around it by changing all the things the person who filed the notice claimed she stole and got the book back up. I imagine it cost her a pretty penny having it taken down for even a week. It was the first in the series, so it pretty much held the rest of the series hostage. Whose going to buy a book missing part one? I thought she was really smart the way she handled it. She also mentioned you when she talked about it on her facebook, so you got some free publicity.Becca Mills said:Yeah, that was me: http://www.kboards.com/index.php/topic,210050.0.html I can't tell whether this is the same kind of thing or not.
Huh?alexandervalmont said:Here is their website : http://wimpysteve.com/disclaimer/
They do not even own the name minecraft, and the term wimpy steve is not even in my titles.
Well, that is a puzzle. And rather crafty. Dastardly even.alexandervalmont said:I just want to make something clear, the thirs party is NOT MOJAN, it is not MINECRAFT, it is just some random people on amazon who sell minecraft diary. How is it possible that THEY are allowed to stop people from selling this?? They do NOT own the copyright as stated on their website.
But they MAY be paying a license to use the name. If they are, you are in the wrong. If they aren't you are BOTH in the wrong. The poor behavior of one person doesn't absolve the poor behavior of another. You are clearly trading on the IP of the Minecraft owners. If the other party doesn't have a license, they are also in violation of the law.alexandervalmont said:I just want to make something clear, the thirs party is NOT MOJAN, it is not MINECRAFT, it is just some random people on amazon who sell minecraft diary. How is it possible that THEY are allowed to stop people from selling this?? They do NOT own the copyright as stated on their website.