I can only guess that five titles in three years (i.e., not enough paths into your publishing world), the covers, and the blurbs contribute to what might be holding you back. None of the covers are branded to a genre or to you as a writer and none of them reflect a genre other than maybe an octopus theme (except Time Trial which looks sorta sci-fi). None of the covers state what the title is--a collection of stories, a short story, a novel, whatever.OwenAdams said:It's time for me to admit I have absolutely no idea where I'm going wrong. I knew week by week I wasn't getting sales often. I ascribed it to short fiction not selling well, or not being focused on my blog, or not knowing enough people, or... well anything. And it's got to the stage where I really doubt my ability to do this as a hobby, let alone a career. I just don't know where I'm going wrong, and I don't even know where to start making it go right, and I've been doing this for three years now.
Comma splices are overrated. In informal speech there is a case to be made for them. They also constitute just one of the tiny factors contributing to the "big language divide" between the USA and the UK. We consider them less of a sacrilege here.Lottie said:You have a really cool concept, but I'm turned off almost immediately by the comma splice in the first sentence of your blurb. If I were browsing Amazon and saw this as a reader, I would skip it on that basis alone.
Maybe you do, but short stories are a legitimate form of writing, and should not be discouraged nor disparaged. Many people like reading them, and ,any enjoy writing them. I do, in both respects. Short stories are harder to sell, even in collections, sure, but they can sell.MyraScott said:1 Timewasters: Christmas Past 18pg
2 Two Cephalopods Walk Into A Bar 77pg
3 Octopus Returns: A Sting in the Tale 38pg
4 The Octopus of Suspense 33pg
5 Timewasters: Time Trial 27pg
Just saying, I throw away fish bigger than these. Do you have plans to write longer works? Do any of these tie into each other, or are they all standalone stories?
Short fiction often sells when bundled. Have you thought of making a collection?
Personally I don't think you're necessarily "going wrong" with anything, as far as your publishing efforts are concerned. The quantity of stories you've published is probably the weakest point in the way you've implemented your strategy, because I think the strongest card up a short fiction writer's sleeve is the principle of hooking a reader on the author's writing style, thus ensuring that each hooked reader will want to read everything done by the author. If you haven't built up a sizable catalog and you publish infrequently, you won't get that kind of necessary momentum going, and that momentum seems critical to a short fiction writer seeing a consistent amount of sales.OwenAdams said:It's time for me to admit I have absolutely no idea where I'm going wrong. I knew week by week I wasn't getting sales often. I ascribed it to short fiction not selling well, or not being focused on my blog, or not knowing enough people, or... well anything. And it's got to the stage where I really doubt my ability to do this as a hobby, let alone a career. I just don't know where I'm going wrong, and I don't even know where to start making it go right, and I've been doing this for three years now.
Not a bad thought, I now have two collections out. I'll share numbers.MyraScott said:Short fiction often sells when bundled. Have you thought of making a collection?
A comma splice is something amateur 'grammaticists' (like the incompetents Strunk & White) like to jump on to prove they are authentic.Matthew Stott said:As for a 'comma splice', I had no idea what one even was. After checking, I kinda don't see the issue..? Perhaps that makes me a grammar fool, but if it reads well, it reads well.
I also gave them a critique on their writing itself. People have red-penned my own comma splices and beaten the habit out of me. Maybe spending so many years in school and grading countless papers has turned me into a pedant. I don't know.Flay Otters said:A comma splice is something amateur 'grammaticists' (like the incompetents Strunk & White) like to jump on to prove they are authentic.
File it along with: don't use semicolons, don't use adverbs, don't end sentences with prepositions, etc.
It is a meaningless correction, as comma splices are routinely used by many well-known and well-respected authors.
If you think the writing is weak then find a realistic reason to critique it rather than falling back on grammatical cant.
You did indeed. And I do understand.Lottie said:I also gave them a critique on their writing itself. People have red-penned my own comma splices and beaten the habit out of me. Maybe spending so many years in school and grading countless papers has turned me into a pedant. I don't know.
I'm sorry if my post came off as snobbish. It wasn't my intention.