Thanks for the tip! It's so much less daunting than re-reading right from the start. I'm just doing that now. I'm not even half way through and already losing the will...
ooooooh be VERY careful with this method. For me, I'll glance at a sentence and "see" a mistake instantly. Upon closer inspection, however, the tense isn't actually wrong.Masha du Toit said:I stumbled on a neat trick for the finding-the-mistakes stage of writing.
Do a search for a common word like "look" or "back" or "when", words that you use quite a lot. The point is not to remove or replace them, but to use the search as a way of skipping randomly through the document. At each point, look at the paragraph surrounding that word.
For some reason when I do that, as opposed to YET ANOTHER read through from the start, the mistakes really jump out at me.
True. It works best for finding homophone errors, typos, overused words, that kind of thing. Not so good for adjusting the tone, pacing, tense or things in which you need to consider the context.Dalya said:ooooooh be VERY careful with this method. For me, I'll glance at a sentence and "see" a mistake instantly. Upon closer inspection, however, the tense isn't actually wrong.
When I'm formatting a document, I have to be really careful I don't put in last-minute typos, because I'll frequently "see" mistakes as I'm putting in a section break.
No it's those hackers. Haven't you heard? They target you via Facebook. Or maybe Amazon sneaks in the typos to undermine self published authors. True story.Jan Hurst-Nicholson said:Mistakes lurk in the computer and only pop out once you've printed it![]()
I believe it!Masha du Toit said:No it's those hackers. Haven't you heard? They target you via Facebook. Or maybe Amazon sneaks in the typos to undermine self published authors. True story.![]()
So editing is really like selective breeding? By limiting the gene pool, you hope the new words will be better ones...smreine said:I firmly believe that typos are like horny rabbits. Every time I close the document, they go at it again, and there are a hundred new ones when I return.
This is a fascinating idea.Masha du Toit said:So editing is really like selective breeding? By limiting the gene pool, you hope the new words will be better ones...
I did that for my last book. Normally it helps a lot, but my first proofreader still came back with a zillion errors.tkkenyon said:I sent the last draft to my Kindle and read it off the Kindle, highlighting mistakes and typos. Works great to read it on a different device. Totally resets my brain and I read what's there instead of what I think is there.
I Save As a Filtered Web Page, then use Calibre to convert that into a mobi, then email it to my Kindle account.
TK Kenyon
This works for me, too. It's like in the olden days, when you print the ms out on paper, which makes it easier to find errors.tkkenyon said:I sent the last draft to my Kindle and read it off the Kindle, highlighting mistakes and typos. Works great to read it on a different device.
I feel a 'typo erotica' farce-fest about to ensue...smreine said:This is a fascinating idea.
I did that for my last book. Normally it helps a lot, but my first proofreader still came back with a zillion errors.
They breed.
smreine said:I firmly believe that typos are like horny rabbits. Every time I close the document, they go at it again, and there are a hundred new ones when I return.
That's a good idea. Sometimes it helps to read it out loud. I don't know if it's because reading aloud is slower, but sometimes you can catch mistakes better that way.tkkenyon said:I sent the last draft to my Kindle and read it off the Kindle, highlighting mistakes and typos. Works great to read it on a different device. Totally resets my brain and I read what's there instead of what I think is there.