When in doubt, just ask. I typically use Twitter and put out a few notices listing the book and the genre.
I agree with you, but the only issue I took with Critters is that so many of my crits received were...somewhat low quality. I'll just leave it at that. The great thing about Critters is anyone can join. The not-so-great thing about Critters is anyone can join.William Stacey said:Online critique group, such as Critters or Critique Circle. You do have to pay it back, however, so it's not just out of the kindness of people's hearts.
But that's no biggie; helping others helps you get better too.
This. Trust is so important. I'm the only one in my small circle not traditionally published yet which has been interesting. Getting to hear the feedback they get from their editors has been even more interesting. I used to do content editting way back in the day, so it's nice to know that my skills are still thereLilianaHart said:I have three author friends and we all beta for each other. We've been doing it for years, and I trust their opinions. They're all multi-published and they write in different genres, so it really helps to hear the varying thoughts.
This raises a good point about the difference. That said, I think it's possible to give a beta while giving a crit. I find my notes (and the notes I get from my ladies) riddled with "As a reader" "Or, if I was just reading this" beta notes squished in between all their awesome critiques.KayBratt said:I gave up working with beta readers and now just exchange manuscripts with a few author friends. Critiques from other authors are much more valuable and they understand the urgency involved in actually following through with a promised beta read and helpful notes.
I totally agree, Caitie. We do the same with slipping those 'as a reader' comments in when needed. So helpful.Caitie Quinn said:This raises a good point about the difference. That said, I think it's possible to give a beta while giving a crit. I find my notes (and the notes I get from my ladies) riddled with "As a reader" "Or, if I was just reading this" beta notes squished in between all their awesome critiques.
But, I know I'm really lucky. Sounds like we've got lots of lucky people here tho!
You might have better luck at the Online Writer's Workshop (OWW). It costs $49 for the year, and you have to pay it back, but the feedback is really good, and there are actually professional editors there who each choose one piece in their genre each month and do an in-depth crit on it for everyone to see. When I was there I had a horror short chosen as the Editor's Pick of the Month, and the feedback I got was extremely useful to me. That one piece of feedback alone was worth the cost to join for the year.Jonathan C. Gillespie said:I agree with you, but the only issue I took with Critters is that so many of my crits received were...somewhat low quality. I'll just leave it at that. The great thing about Critters is anyone can join. The not-so-great thing about Critters is anyone can join.