So far I'm 1 for 1, lol.
That's tempting, but isn't double opt-in required by spam laws?TobiasRoote said:I use my own mailing system on my site. I took a conscious decision not to go for the double opt-in because if people do come to my website, and fill in the information required they have already made their commitment. They are all adults with freedom of choice - I respect that.
It's not a blanket requirement that requires a kneejerk response every time.Domino Finn said:That's tempting, but isn't double opt-in required by spam laws?
Actually it IS. YOU have total control over your lists. They're not managed by anyone else and it is VERY simple to do if you have a website. Your own web platform manages your emails and you don't fall foul of anyone else's rules. In addition, its cost effective if you go over the maximum free addresses you are allowed on the various alternatives. you can export/import addresses to/from any of the other platforms. It's incredibly versatile and its yours.RBC said:Advice to use 'your own mailing system' is not great.
What about when you get to send mass emails to thousands of subscribers? From personal email address? Way easier to get blacklisted than from reputable companies?TobiasRoote said:Actually it IS. YOU have total control over your lists. They're not managed by anyone else and it is VERY simple to do if you have a website. Your own web platform manages your emails and you don't fall foul of anyone else's rules. In addition, its cost effective if you go over the maximum free addresses you are allowed on the various alternatives. you can export/import addresses to/from any of the other platforms. It's incredibly versatile and its yours.
Having used both Mailchimp and built websites for twenty years, I think both have merit. If you have your own website it makes sense to keep it in-house.
So far, 50% of the people who single-opted also double-opted (and made it to the list).RBC said:@Domino, how are those subscribers now? Did some of them confirmed the opt-in?
Maybe. I prefer single optin myself but who knows.Domino Finn said:So far, 50% of the people who single-opted also double-opted (and made it to the list).
An additional benefit of the double opt-in is that it ensures that the person on your list is actually able to receive an email from you. A single opt address can be a typo, or fake, or it can be legit but filtered out as spam, or any number of things.
It's a MailMunch plug-in and I don't totally trust that it works great. I kinda hacked the pop-up. The box has a message that says "Check your inbox to confim membership" but that boring and corporatey. I'm gonna change it to "Check your inbox for your free books."RBC said:Maybe. I prefer single optin myself but who knows.
50% is a bit low. What's your Page that shows up after people sign up first time? Is it very clear on what to do next. Maybe improvement there would raise the %.![]()
Sites like Thrillist, DailyWorth or TheSkimm don't have double optin and have build great audiences. Not sure it's required then for US...Caimin said:Double opt-in in the way to go. It's required by anti-spam laws in most countries and it prevents malicious (or well meant) sign-ups by someone else using your email address.
It also helps remind people that they agreed to get emails from you. Otherwise, if they forget, they may hit the spam button instead of the unsubcribe link. If that happens too many times, your sending address and domain will be flagged as a source of spam and your delivery rate will plummet.