Joined
·
1,660 Posts
This morning I found a review of the movie Solaris by Roger Ebert, which said this, in part:
"One of the most frequent charges against science-fiction is that it replaces emotion with intellect. Its characters are people who live by and for the mind, and their personal relationships are likely to be stifled and awkward, That's probably true enough of most s-f novels (although exceptions range from Fredric Brown's "The Lights in the Sky are Stars" to a lot of the work by Theodore Sturgeon), but it's even more true of science-fiction movies."
I don't have time to check out those books, but fans of the genre might, if so inclined. I think I'll take a look at Solaris. Anyone know it?
Ebert's comment made me feel better about my own stuff....
"One of the most frequent charges against science-fiction is that it replaces emotion with intellect. Its characters are people who live by and for the mind, and their personal relationships are likely to be stifled and awkward, That's probably true enough of most s-f novels (although exceptions range from Fredric Brown's "The Lights in the Sky are Stars" to a lot of the work by Theodore Sturgeon), but it's even more true of science-fiction movies."
I don't have time to check out those books, but fans of the genre might, if so inclined. I think I'll take a look at Solaris. Anyone know it?
Ebert's comment made me feel better about my own stuff....
