I signed with someone like this once. Never again.
This is not a bad idea, nor is calling the publisher directly again (which I did last weekend, at which point I considered the matter taken care of...). I guess I'm just baffled as to where this pushback is coming from, especially when it's explicitly in the contract. Absurd power play? I mean, I'm actually a pretty good AD, and I'm doing it for free. Sheesh.A. Kelly said:I would have dumped communication with the assistant after the 2nd email.
I'm rather doubtful this is the case - we're using the cover art I commissioned when I self-published, so it's virtually just new text - although I suppose it's possible. Even so, why wouldn't they explain that to me? And why would they contract with a designer (just for new text!) in a way that would require them to breach the contract they have with me?SBJones said:I'll give the small press the benefit of the doubt in my response based upon what you have posted so far. We don't know how this company is set up to function, nor do we know how the cover artist people are set up. It's entirely possible that the cover artist is a larger company as well and several artists may touch your cover. They have a workload and workflow to manage and when sub-contracted by the publisher, the methods of that workflow are negotiated and finalized. There simply may not be a reasonable way for you to directly inject yourself as Art Director into this existing system by bypassing the established workflow and communicating directly with the cover art company. Thus the small publisher sends you a draft, waits for your notes, approvals and whatnot then simply forwards them to the cover artists company as contracted.
My recommendation would be to give them Art Direction through the communication channels they have set up. If your art direction is followed, great. If not that's a different problem.
"Where there are three people, there are politics." - attributed to Niccolo Machiavelli.IreneP said:Just a guess, but I'm betting a lot of this is caused by you having an unusual clause in your contract. You are outside their normal procedure and it's causing confusion among the staff.
^^^ ThisSBJones said:I'll give the small press the benefit of the doubt in my response based upon what you have posted so far. We don't know how this company is set up to function, nor do we know how the cover artist people are set up. It's entirely possible that the cover artist is a larger company as well and several artists may touch your cover. They have a workload and workflow to manage and when sub-contracted by the publisher, the methods of that workflow are negotiated and finalized. There simply may not be a reasonable way for you to directly inject yourself as Art Director into this existing system by bypassing the established workflow and communicating directly with the cover art company. Thus the small publisher sends you a draft, waits for your notes, approvals and whatnot then simply forwards them to the cover artists company as contracted.
My recommendation would be to give them Art Direction through the communication channels they have set up. If your art direction is followed, great. If not that's a different problem.
In fact, this is a very new, very small press. I'm inclined to think that your advice to "respect the lines of communication that they prefer," at the expense of the contract's language, does a disservice to me and anyone who might find themselves in my position. If you'll read my responses, i do plan on keeping everyone in the loop with this.alawston said:This sounds like a very large small press. My own perception (and indeed experience) of small presses is that they tend to be either one man (person) bands, or a one person (man) band that delegates a bit, but who still treats the company very much as Daddy's (Mummy's) train set.
I think it's very likely that within the context of this company, you are very much being treated as their AD would be in that you're being consulted, but ultimately everything remains under the publisher's control, and they like to hold the reins of communication. This attitude would very much be in line with other authors turned publishers who I know.
As to whether you're being a diva, I'm afraid I rather think that you might be. You started quoting the contract very early on in the exchange, which always puts people's backs up. And while you put that clause into your contract, I don't see anything that details how that Art Director role is going to work contractually with this company, which means you're pretty much tied in to their way of handling things.
Moving on from small presses, even in my day job in magazine publishing, I would not want an external writer going away and talking independently to an external designer about a product that was coming out under my brand, without at least being kept in the loop of the conversation. That kind of thing leads, very often, to designers going way over budget with multiple drafts, etc. It leads to logos being put in the wrong place, to house style guidelines falling by the wayside. It leads to trouble, to put it simply. And as the publisher is the one footing the bill...
You've moved from a self-publishing scenario to a much more collaborative model here, and I think you do need to respect the lines of communication that they prefer.