I recognize it as a problem.Satchya said:
I handle it by researching more.....Meaning I don't handle it well, after all I did say it was a problem.
I recognize it as a problem.Satchya said:Does anyone else have this problem? How do you handle it? Do you think it is a problem?
Well, I can't recommend depending upon online sources, especially blogs, for research. They are all too often unsourced and inaccurate. How do you know they have a clue what they're talking about? Do they list their sources? Are the original sources? The amount of crap that is out there online is unbelievable.Satchya said:Does anyone else have this problem?
I am making progress on my WIP, but only 500-800 words a day. The main problem? I get sidetracked by all of the lovely, lovely research materials there are available online.
Do I need to know what was inside a Regency-era Lady's bedroom? Three hours down the drain reading about Brussels carpeting and the history of beds from "on the floor", to "on ropes with a wooden frame", to luxurious wooden cabinets, to carved four posters with heavy damask drapery, to lighter carved wood with washable embroidered linen curtains (ding,ding,ding--that last one, that's the one in the Regency bedroom)....and then, of course, all the other furniture too. I lied, it wasn't only three hours, it was most of a day.
I won't even start on all of the wonderful blogs and pages out there full of everything I could ever need to know about Regency times. Why I feel I need to read them all BEFORE I write anything (especially since I already have a pretty good grasp of the time period to begin with) I don't know.
I have characters swapping bodies, so of course I need to research if any type of witchery or spells exist to do that (don't want to torque off any witches by getting it wrong). Which leads to reading all about astral projection, and the body-mind-soul connection, etc., etc.
And looking up body-swapping leads to pages about cliches in body-swapping fiction and movies, which leads to the original novel that all such movies and books are based on, "Vice Versa or A Lesson to Fathers" by F. Anstey, written in 1882. So, of course I must download that off of Amazon and I'm going to have to read that this afternoon and evening.And the English major in me says to myself, "Self, surely that book wasn't written in a vacuum, surely it must have been based on some folk tales or fairy tales or other such things that involved body-switching...and you know you need to research those, too!"
Arrgggghhhh!!!
All of this "researching", beyond a very minimum amount, is just a fancy way of saying "goofing off not writing." Right? I mean, I've never tried to write a novel before, so I don't know if I'm doing it the right way or the wrong way. I know "researching" is a lot of fun, and it leads to some great ideas...but it also distracts me from time I could spend buckling down and getting words put on a page.
Does anyone else have this problem? How do you handle it? Do you think it is a problem?
Yeah. I spend so much time looking at Google Maps to get a sense of geography, image searching places to get the details of what these places look like, etc. My god, if I'd been doing this twenty years ago, I might have had to leave my couch.MegHarris said:I just want to say how lucky we are to have all this research at our fingertips. When I was writing my first romance, a historical set in colonial America, I had to comb through old newspaper clippings (fortunately my mom, a local history buff and writer, had a ton), pull dusty books out of the library and copy the relevant info into spiral-bound notebooks, and visit period houses (a terrific thing to do if you're writing a colonial romance and happen to live in Virginia, but not as feasible if you're an American writing books set in Regency England). This was back in the mid-nineties, and I'm sure there was an internet then, but I didn't have access to it. I don't recall getting an internet connection till 1997, and then it was slow and cranky and the family yelled at me because I was constantly tying up the phone line. And I'm sure the quality and quantity of information available online has increased exponentially...
Oh, yes, my point. Did I have one? I guess it's that yeah, research can be entirely too absorbing... but now at least you're actually wasting time on the research itself, rather than spending hours just trying to hunt down a single useful crumb of information. Enjoy the riches of the information age, and let yourself roll around happily in the freely available stuff that's out there. But take time to write, too, even if you have to force yourself to turn off the browser for an hour or two at a time to do it. Because you're right.. researching won't produce a book. Only writing will!
There's "feeling of authenticity" and there's writing a text book lol. The novel I'm working on is partly set in England 1000 years ago. A guy in my writing group, who seems to have encyclopedic knowledge of everything, read it and pointed out the correct name of the currency they used then. Also pointed out there were no potatoes there at the time.Satchya said:Does anyone else have this problem?
I am making progress on my WIP, but only 500-800 words a day. The main problem? I get sidetracked by all of the lovely, lovely research materials there are available online.
Do I need to know what was inside a Regency-era Lady's bedroom? Three hours down the drain reading about Brussels carpeting and the history of beds from "on the floor", to "on ropes with a wooden frame", to luxurious wooden cabinets, to carved four posters with heavy damask drapery, to lighter carved wood with washable embroidered linen curtains (ding,ding,ding--that last one, that's the one in the Regency bedroom)....and then, of course, all the other furniture too. I lied, it wasn't only three hours, it was most of a day.
I won't even start on all of the wonderful blogs and pages out there full of everything I could ever need to know about Regency times. Why I feel I need to read them all BEFORE I write anything (especially since I already have a pretty good grasp of the time period to begin with) I don't know.
I have characters swapping bodies, so of course I need to research if any type of witchery or spells exist to do that (don't want to torque off any witches by getting it wrong). Which leads to reading all about astral projection, and the body-mind-soul connection, etc., etc.
And looking up body-swapping leads to pages about cliches in body-swapping fiction and movies, which leads to the original novel that all such movies and books are based on, "Vice Versa or A Lesson to Fathers" by F. Anstey, written in 1882. So, of course I must download that off of Amazon and I'm going to have to read that this afternoon and evening.And the English major in me says to myself, "Self, surely that book wasn't written in a vacuum, surely it must have been based on some folk tales or fairy tales or other such things that involved body-switching...and you know you need to research those, too!"
Arrgggghhhh!!!
All of this "researching", beyond a very minimum amount, is just a fancy way of saying "goofing off not writing." Right? I mean, I've never tried to write a novel before, so I don't know if I'm doing it the right way or the wrong way. I know "researching" is a lot of fun, and it leads to some great ideas...but it also distracts me from time I could spend buckling down and getting words put on a page.
Does anyone else have this problem? How do you handle it? Do you think it is a problem?
Well, it depends on the book and the genre. If you're writing a serious historical novel, you had best do tons of research, and try to make it right to the best of your ability. A historical romance can be less loaded with details (depending on whether it's a "wallpaper" historical or not), but still, if you get your facts wrong, some readers will let you know. I agree that it's generally not a good idea to drop in paragraph after paragraph of facts unrelated to the plot, but some genres don't really allow you to "use research sparingly," either.Lesson learned: use research sparingly, and only to advance character or plot.
It really is a fine line with a historical romance. I know as a reader I would be entirely put off if a dress with a bustle showed up in a Regency romance because the writer didn't do her research. Or if the female protagonist in full court dress wasn't described with a train, hoop skirts, and ostrich feathers in her hair. But you're right that the overall amount of research is not nearly as daunting as for a true historical fiction novel. Nor are the expectations of absolute accuracy the same.MegHarris said:Well, it depends on the book and the genre. If you're writing a serious historical novel, you had best do tons of research, and try to make it right to the best of your ability. A historical romance can be less loaded with details (depending on whether it's a "wallpaper" historical or not), but still, if you get your facts wrong, some readers will let you know. I agree that it's generally not a good idea to drop in paragraph after paragraph of facts unrelated to the plot, but some genres don't really allow you to "use research sparingly," either.
No insult intended. A lot of people really don't know the difference and the results can be ... unfortunate to put it mildly. Of course, I write and read "serious" historical novels rather than romances. There is some difference but it's still a good idea to take research seriously. Even a historical romance (not something I read much of for exactly this reason) I'll slam down if it tells me a woman in 13th century England was using a spinning wheel as a certain well-known romance writer did. Of course, she didn't seem to know that a knight riding a destrier down the street was about the same as driving a Sherman tank to the grocery store. But you have to have that Sherman tank if your guy is going to be all macho, right?Satchya said:Don't worry, JR. I haven't written a novel before, but I have a degree in English with a minor in History, and spent over ten years as a freelance writer of magazine articles before I became a full-time SAHM. I know all about fact-checking and the difference between a primary source and a Wiki page.
That said, I'm not writing historical fiction. I'm just writing a fluffy, fun little book. I only need enough flavor of the times for it to taste authentic, which is why having a personality that delights in research is actually slowing me down, I think.
I do the same thing - it's like an attention deficit disorder for writers.ToniD said:OMG yes I have this problem. In spades. There are so many detours that beckon. I could spend hours looking at photos of minerals under the scanning electron microscope. I mean, there's this amazing micrograph of an etched sand grain....
And then I'm off to a poetry site to look up the rest of "to see a world in a grain of sand"...
And then I'm thinking beaches and vacations and there goes the morning.