You go, girl! Having fun and being happy is always a good thing.
I concur wholeheartedly. This ain't some grand noble calling, some uber-meaningful world-changing thing we're doing here. We're telling stories, for fun. And hoping to make some $ from it. Nada mas.valeriec80 said:It's a book. It's entertainment....But, overall, this is not serious business. It's entertainment. And I need to remember that more often....So my new view on all of this is: Have more fun. Publish your books. It's not really hurting anyone, is it?
Exactly!Michael Kingswood said:I concur wholeheartedly. This ain't some grand noble calling, some uber-meaningful world-changing thing we're doing here. We're telling stories, for fun. And hoping to make some $ from it. Nada mas.
And you know what? It was the same for Shakespeare, Dickens, and all those other "giants". Think they were concerned with some huge deep meaning, or that they wallowed in self-delusions about how sublime their "art" was? No way. I guaran-d*mn-tee you Shakespeare was more concerned with getting butts in seats in his theatre than on fulfilling some lofty artistic vision.
We aren't curing cancer here, people.
I totally agree! Bravo!valeriec80 said:So my new view on all of this is: Have more fun. Publish your books. It's not really hurting anyone, is it?
Wonderfully put!Michael Kingswood said:I concur wholeheartedly. This ain't some grand noble calling, some uber-meaningful world-changing thing we're doing here. We're telling stories, for fun. And hoping to make some $ from it. Nada mas.
And you know what? It was the same for Shakespeare, Dickens, and all those other "giants". Think they were concerned with some huge deep meaning, or that they wallowed in self-delusions about how sublime their "art" was? No way. I guaran-d*mn-tee you Shakespeare was more concerned with getting butts in seats in his theatre than on fulfilling some lofty artistic vision.
We aren't curing cancer here, people.
If you enjoy it and nothing comes of it, then you keep playing in the beer league. Those are fun too. But even at that level, why not strive to be the best beer leaguer out there?Joyce DeBacco said:"All that said, you have to enjoy doing it, or you'll never put in the work."
And if you do enjoy doing it and have put in the work, but nothing comes of it, what then? I'm certainly not going to take to drink or worse yet, a pistol to my head as one posthumous Pulitzer winner did.
All we can do is our best, and if that's not enough, we have our families, our health, other interests. My opinion anyway.
Joyce
Viv Savage, the late keyboardist for Spinal Tap, said it best: "Have a good time all the time."valeriec80 said:So my new view on all of this is: Have more fun.
There's also a sliding scale to that ballance, and everyone has to determine where they fit on there. at the one end, you have the person to whom writing is everything. It is their identity, head to toe. That's the person who gets a divorce because the spouse talks too much when they are trying to write, and quits their job so they can get a job that's more conducive to writing time. Every ounce of energy is expended to be the best writer they can be. On the other end you have the kid who throws together a few paragraphs when he's drunk and stoned and posts it on Kindle to see if anyone will buy it. The rest of us fall somehere in the middle. The people who dream of being the best writer in the world, and are driven whether by financial needs or competetive juices probably smile at the writer who tells others to not take it so seriously. The people who know it's a lot of work and know they'll never want to put in that much time and effort, applaud it. So, balance is a relative term.Andrew Biss said:The reason is, there's a balance to strike.
lmao! Spot on. This is why many people are trying to become writers, because they're not having fun where they work now.Joe Vasicek said:But when it comes to the work itself...if I'm not having fun, why the hell would I ever want to do this for a living?