I heard a line from a character in a Television series recently claiming that someone had spent "more time on her knees than Paris Hilton".David Scroggins said:
I heard a line from a character in a Television series recently claiming that someone had spent "more time on her knees than Paris Hilton".David Scroggins said:I'm trying to be careful and not do anything that could get me into trouble, but I'm scratching my head on this one. I'm in the middle of a story about a serial killer that's set in the 1970s. The guy is obsessed with movie stars from the black and white era of television. I need to make a mention of Judy Garland in the book, as she's who he "models" himself after physically.
Naturally, I can't mention any of her songs or films by either title or lyric, but could I make a mention of her name and vaguely describe a film or song? For example:
I turned on the radio, and one of those Judy Garland Vaudville numbers about the guy who got away blared through the speakers. I smiled, thinking to myself that the man I had wouldn't be so lucky.
That's not an actual line. It's just along the lines of how I would use her name. I've searched around, but I still don't know for sure if this is acceptable. Advice?![]()
Good point. I've heard similar things in the past. I'm hoping that my mention should be fine based on your example, but if not, I can always be more vague. I figure if there's any problems, I could say "Judy's voice blared through the speakers. She was singing that song about lovers getting away."DarkScribe said:I heard a line from a character in a Television series recently claiming that someone had spent "more time on her knees than Paris Hilton".
There is nothing to stop anyone noting that a certain song, sung by a certain singer was playing. You cannot quote lyrics, but you can mention songs and who sang them. For instance at the moment a radio close to me is playing Sharon O'Neill singing Asian Paradise. No law, rule or regulation can prevent me from mentioning that to anyone, in print or using any other means of communication. If I was to make a disparaging comment about the singer or the song whoever holds the rights MIGHT try to sue - but not if the comment was described as simply my opinion. I am entitled to an opinion, but I cannot express it as fact.David Scroggins said:Good point. I've heard similar things in the past. I'm hoping that my mention should be fine based on your example, but if not, I can always be more vague. I figure if there's any problems, I could say "Judy's voice blared through the speakers. She was singing that song about lovers getting away."
Titles are not included in the copyright and cannot be copyrighted. People mention the titles of songs and titles in books all the time. As long as you don't quote lyrics, it's no problem. I wouldn't say anything disparaging since her estate could object to that (unlikely but possible) but the works can certainly be specifically mentioned.David Scroggins said:I'm trying to be careful and not do anything that could get me into trouble, but I'm scratching my head on this one. I'm in the middle of a story about a serial killer that's set in the 1970s. The guy is obsessed with movie stars from the black and white era of television. I need to make a mention of Judy Garland in the book, as she's who he "models" himself after physically.
Naturally, I can't mention any of her songs or films by either title or lyric, but could I make a mention of her name and vaguely describe a film or song? For example:
I turned on the radio, and one of those Judy Garland Vaudville numbers about the guy who got away blared through the speakers. I smiled, thinking to myself that the man I had wouldn't be so lucky.
That's not an actual line. It's just along the lines of how I would use her name. I've searched around, but I still don't know for sure if this is acceptable. Advice?![]()
There was a South Park episode where Oprah's vagina took hostages. I had difficulty believing that they could get away with that.P.C. (Peter) Anders said:I do not believe there is any limit to mentioning celebrities--they are considered to have lost their right to privacy to anything they have done in public. (Even though I do sympathize with celebrities who are hounded by paparazzi or those whose privacy is invaded.)
One of the most amazing shows to watch, one that skewers celebrities, is South Park. If you see the Paris Hilton episode . . . I don't know of any show that has gone that far!
Yes, and titles are totally copyright free.
I have seen it before - we get QI here. Sometimes a good show, at other times it can be painfully boring. It was losing audience to Doc Martin.humblenations said:Would Oprah go to court to fight it? It would just draw attention to her vagina surely. And if she can't laugh at her vagina she has a problem. And her vagina would be laughed out of court. Fair usage in comedy is an accepted defence. Or at least it is in England.
This here is something that is quite interesting. it's about all the legal defences for using famous people in England. Watch and learn. BTW, it's wrapped in comedy but there are some good facts there. Watch and learn: