And here I THOUGHT that was because it was made by Amazon.Jim1010 said:
( Tsk, Tsk. Silly wabbit)
And here I THOUGHT that was because it was made by Amazon.Jim1010 said:Kindle 2 is fun, but it would never have been made by Apple. Here are four reasons. There are many more!
I will apologize for the 'hater' remark, however, I question the purpose of the post.Ann Von Hagel said:O.K. Folks. Ease up. Jim1010 is entitled to his opinion . . . We shall not call each other Haters. . .we shall not bash the Apple company. If you disagree, all you need to say is "I disagree". . . . .
For the record, Jim, I disagree with your contention that it will be superseded by Apple or Google without radical improvement. I find even the Kindle 1 to be superior, as a reading device, to an iPhone or any other PDA type device. My opinion only, of course.
Ann
Ok, Jim, you are entitled to an honest opinion. I disagree with you on much of what you said, so I will answer you point by point:Jim1010 said:Kindle 2 is fun, but it would never have been made by Apple. Here are four reasons. There are many more!
1. The screen still isn't bright like paper. It looks dull and waxy, like multiply-recycled paper, or unbleached paper that can be found in some Indian and third-world books.
2. The screen savers cannot be removed. This seems to be a small point here on KindleBoard, but Apple would never let it happen. There will be people, like me, who find them generic and childish. Someone said, on another post, that they are reminiscent of the posters in Barnes and Noble. That is not praise! They are Eurocentric, clichéd, unimaginative, and above all they are not mine! Apple would have made it easier, not harder, to get rid of the screensavers.
3. Apple would have made it easy to make the top and bottom of the screen blank. That extra information can be very annoying. Why not just show it when the user presses a button? Kindle 2 is reminiscent of Microsoft Word 2008, which also forces an extra bar on users (just above the page), which cannot be removed.
4. The design is intermittently silly. The packaging reminds me of shallow trays that are sometimes used by Chinese and Thai takeways. The spills of letters that ornament the packaging, and also the manual, look like 1970s student graphic designs.
5. Apple would have had a touch screen, like the iPhone, instead of the keyboard, which is not needed all the time -- so why show it all the time?
I'm not sad I bought the Kindle 2, but I can clearly see it will be superseded by Apple, or Google, unless it radically improves in its next incarnation.
Exactly, Amazon introduced a book reader to let them sell ebooks,with books being their primary business. Apple is a hardware manufacturer without the available books. Kindle wins hands down in the available books category.ScottBooks said:I seriously doubt that Apple or Google will ever approach the content available to the Kindle. As a Reader, that is all that matters.
Bingo!intinst said:Exactly, Amazon introduced a book reader to let them sell ebooks,with books being their primary business. Apple is a hardware manufacturer without the available books. Kindle wins hands down in the available books category.
Eww backlight RUINS reading. It causing glares AND headaches/eyestrain. Not everyone needs it all on what electronic device.Jim1010 said:Replying to farmwife99:
Right, that's exactly what the excellent David Pogue said in his "Ndew York Times" review of the Kindle 2: he said that she one thing no one gets is that the Kindle doesn't "replace" anything, including e-readers on cell phones: people use everything at once.
Yep Jobs implied that the hip Ipod users do not read. I guess its too low of them and uncool to read.Ron said:Wasn't it Steve jobs that stated that Apple would not produce an E-Reader because people do not read anymore?